Too bold fonts.

Goffioul Michael goffioul at imec.be
Mon Mar 7 09:48:11 CET 2005


> Later in the file I can see this:
> 
> %%BeginSetup
> % Fonts and encodings used
> /LucidaConsoleList [
> [ /LucidaConsole 1.0 0.0 ]
>   [ /LucidaConsole 1.0 0.0 ]
>   [ /Courier 1.000 0.000 ]
> ] d
> %%BeginFont: Lucida Console
> %!PS-Adobe-3.0 Resource-Font
> %%Copyright: Copyright ╘ 1993 Bigelow & Holmes Inc. All 
> rights reserved.
> %%Creator: Converted from TrueType by Qt
> ...
> ...
> %%BeginFont: LucidaConsole
> %!PS-AdobeFont-1.0 Composite Font
> %%FontName: LucidaConsole-Uni
> %%Creator: Composite font created by Qt
> 
> From the line "Converted from TrueType by Qt" I can guess 
> that some font 
> convertions are done. Could these conversions be the source 
> of the problem ?

I don't see anything wrong here and in the file you sent. The font looks like correctly
embedded. When viewing the file (under Windows), I don't have that feeling of too
bold font, it looks normal.

> Recently I've found one more detail: in the PPD file there 
> are lines declaring 
> fonts such as:
> *Font AvantGarde-Book: Standard "(001.006S)" Standard ROM
> and so on, about 20 lines (but unfortunely I have only some 
> of these installed 
> on my system). If I'm using one of these fonts then PS file 
> and printouts 
> looks as expected. What does this mean ? How can it affect 
> the text->PS 
> conversion ?

The PPD file defines that fonts that are built in the printer or the printer driver
(the latter being ghostscript most of the time, except for native PS printers). Those
fonts do not have to be provided to the printer, other fonts should be embedded if
you want correct print result.
But again, your PS file looks normal.

Michael.


More information about the kde-print mailing list