Voting rights - the GNOME way

[Neil Stevens]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday November 23, 2002 11:05, Daniel Molkentin wrote:
> However, KDE e.V. as "protector of KDEs interest" should be able to step
> in when the owner of an account hurts the project, but all that can be
> settled on the lists in 99% of all cases and the e.V. Rules should
> reflect that.

Should it?  Why can't a separate, more accessable body, one whose 
membership is a superset, rather than a subset, of the CVS accounts take 
that role?  I think e.V.'s membership is far too exclusive to be trusted 
with most KDE matters.

- -- 
Neil Stevens - neil@qualityassistant.com
Delenda est Carthago
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE939Y9f7mnligQOmERAvgYAJ4vmvcuMl24R4TGeoeSTRKvDzPUpgCdGB/B
0eGTJJXkwbpn+oFfNMczNy4=
=RZ5a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----