Poll: sorting to-dos by priority

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Dienstag, 15. Juni 2021 19:16:59 CEST Glen Ditchfield wrote:
> To be clear:  currently, both the printed list and the displayed list allow
> users to choose between "sort in ascending order" and "sort in descending
> order".  Unfortunately, they disagree on what "ascending" and "descending"
> mean.
> 
> My question is, if you have chosen to sort a list of to-dos by priority in
> *ascending* order, would you prefer to see the to-dos sorted as
>   A) 1, 2, 3, ... 9 (lowest to highest number)
>   B) 9, 8, 7, ... 1 (lowest to highest priority)

I think the best solution is to avoid the ambiguous "ascending order" and 
"descending order" and use something like "Highest Priority on Top" and 
"Lowest Priority on Top".

For example, KMail shows the options "Least Recent on Top" and "Most Recent on 
Top" (instead of "ascending"/"descending") for the sort direction, if the sort 
order is set to "By Date/Time".

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20210615/5f1678f9/attachment.sig>