Thanks for your work on KDE PIM, keep on, am glad user

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Freitag, 12. Juni 2020 13:08:08 CEST Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Dear Friedrich, dear KDEPIM community,
> 
> Friedrich W. H. Kossebau - 12.06.20, 12:55:36 CEST:
> > motivated by some sad talk elsewhere, let me quickly give you a hug:
> > 
> > I have been using at least KMail for ages, and while of course also
> > there are some hick-ups (but which more complex software does not
> > have that, even more when developed in free time), it is my daily
> > email assistant. I am very thankful for your continued work to keep
> > it alive over all the years, and sharing the result with the rest of
> > us to also enjoy it.
> 
> I am also grateful for all the work KDEPIM developers put into the
> software. I expressed that several times over the last years.
> 
> Thank you for all the work you do to improve it, dear KDEPIM developers.
> 
> That is in no way diminished by my other post. Quite the contrary. If I
> didn't care about KDEPIM I would not have written the other post.
> 
> In order not to hi-jack this thread I skip commenting on the "which more
> complex software does not have that" question.

Well, you left out an important part of the question when quoting it, namely 
"even more when developed in free time". I don't know about Evolution, but, as 
far as I know, Thunderbird is developed by several paid developers.

I don't think that the situation with KMail will change as long as it's 
developed by volunteers in their spare time. I'd be very happy to be proven 
wrong.

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20200612/3ae6c113/attachment.sig>