KTimeTracker KF5 port
Sandro Knauß
sknauss at kde.org
Mon Mar 25 19:31:13 GMT 2019
Hi,
> I spent some hours to kick-start the KF5 port of KTimeTracker [1].
kewl!
> 1. What are the chances to get KTimeTracker back into KDE PIM
> releases? Does it fit the product vision?
release independently makes sense. So you start this process by releasing some
versions completely independent and after that you can request a review and
can decide whether you want continue to release independently in extragear or
to release in the Applications umbrella. but this is topic for the kde-core-
devel at kde.org mailing list.
> 2. KTimeTracker used to support KontactInterface. However
> KTimeTracker is in my opinion self-sufficient, there's little sense in
> running Kontact for the KTimeTracker functionality, thus I would
> better remove the Kontact part to reduce the amount of code to
> support. What are your opinions on KTimeTracker vs Kontact?
> 3. My ktimetracker.git repo is forked from kdepim.git:KDE/4.14, thus
> the repo is huge. How do I rewrite the commit log to preserve only the
> KTimeTracker-related history? What commands did you run to produce
> kmail.git from kdepim.git?
best ask the sysadmins, the helped us at this step. Do you know whom to ask?
> Why I started work on KTimeTracker KF5: I got used to KTimeTracker
> around 2012 and never found a better tool to track my working hours
> per task.
are you aware that there is another Qt5 base time tracker - charmtimetracker:
https://github.com/KDAB/Charm
maybe it makes sense to join forces?
hefee
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20190325/475ec169/attachment.sig>
More information about the kde-pim
mailing list