KHolidays as Framework (redux)

[Volker Krause]

On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 18:36:10 CET Dominik Haumann wrote:
> Another question: there are holiday files in the git repo. Are these files
> compiled in as resource or loaded via filesystem?
> 
> If these files are not added as resource, this probably breaks on Windows
> and OSX.

Good point, addressed in https://phabricator.kde.org/D10135 .

Thanks,
Volker

> Am 20.01.2018 17:37 schrieb "Dominik Haumann" <dhaumann at kde.org>:
> 
> Am 20.01.2018 17:22 schrieb "Volker Krause" <vkrause at kde.org>:
> 
> Thanks, should be fixed now.
> 
> 
> Certainly better, although code examples and the like still would make a
> significant difference ;)
> 
> Cheers
> Dominik
> 
> On Saturday, 20 January 2018 15:17:53 CET Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > CC: only kdepim, kde-frameworks-devel
> > 
> > I have some general comments about the API documentation. Looking at
> > https://api.kde.org/stable/kdepimlibs-apidocs/kholidays/html/classes.html
> > the list mostly (only?) contains classes that are internal. Looking at
> > https://github.com/KDE/kholidays/blob/master/src/holiday.h
> > we can see documentation exists also for important classes, but the docs
> > are not listed because the class documentation is missing.
> > 
> > This is not a showstopper, but without accessible API, the visibility of
> > this framework is much reduced. It would be nice, if the API documentation
> > is complete, so here is still some room for improvement ;)
> > 
> > Best regards
> > Dominik
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Am 20.01.2018 11:39 schrieb "Volker Krause" <vkrause at kde.org>:
> > 
> > On Sunday, 14 January 2018 12:55:30 CET David Faure wrote:
> > > On dimanche 14 janvier 2018 10:20:38 CET Volker Krause wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 12:03:15 CET Volker Krause wrote:
> > > > > On Friday 01 January 2016 18:24:17 David Faure wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday 24 December 2015 12:28:13 John Layt wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It's xmas holidays, so it must be time to poke a stick at
> > 
> > KHolidays
> > 
> > > > > > > again
> > > > > > > for inclusion as a Framework. As far as I am aware there are no
> > > > > > > outstanding
> > > > > > > porting issues with KHolidays and it is ready for review to be
> > > > > > > included
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > a Tier 1 Framework in the next possible release. What's the next
> > > > > > > step?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Please make sure it passes all of the items in this checklist
> > > > > > https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/CreationGuidelines
> > > > > 
> > > > > AFAICS this is followed, apart from using the KF5 version number and
> > > > > actually being marked as a framework, which I guess is pending
> > 
> > framework
> > 
> > > > > approval.
> > > > 
> > > > This got lost somehow, any objection to executing the move to
> 
> frameworks
> 
> > > > for 5.43, say end of this week?
> > > 
> > > Go ahead.
> > 
> > The necessary metainfo and CMake changes are pushed, the sysadmin ticket
> 
> for
> 
> > the repo metadata change is T7791.
> > 
> > Summary: KHolidays will not be part of the 18.x KDE Application releases
> > anymore, but instead become part of the KDE Frameworks releases with
> 
> version
> 
> > 5.43. There are no ABI or name changes, just the .so version increases
> 
> from
> 
> > 5.7 to 5.43 to match the rest of KF5, so the transition should hopefully
> 
> be
> 
> > hardly noticeable.
> > Side benefit: plasma-workspace no longer depends on a library from KDE
> > Application releases.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Volker

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20180127/0123c499/attachment.sig>