libkdepim relicensing

[Adriaan de Groot]

Hi Kevin,

On Saturday 10 June 2017 15:00:46 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> You have contributed in the past to one or more of the following files
> inside of libkdepim:

git log doesn't say so, but I guess the history of these files goes way back.

>  1) Are you okay with relicensing your contributions done under "GPLv2" to
> "GPLv2 or later"?

yes
 
>  2) Are you okay with relicensing your contributions done under "GPLv2" to
> "GPLv2 or GPLv3" ?

no

>  3) Are you okay with relicensing your contributions done under "LGPLv2" to
> "LGPLv2 or later"?

yes
 
>  4) Are you okay with relicensing your contributions done under "LGPLv2" to
> "LGPLv2 or LGPLv3"?

no

>  5) Are you okay with the KDE e.V. deciding on a future licensing change to
> your code, should that be necessary?

yes

Since I have signed the FLA for KDE, my contributions would typically be under 
the "[L]GPL version 2 or version 3 or later versions approved by the 
membership of KDE e.V.", and that is my preferred change.

[ade]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20170610/4dbf353f/attachment.sig>