Setting 4.14 PIM bugs to UNMAINTAINED

David Jarvie djarvie at kde.org
Mon Jan 23 00:05:59 GMT 2017


On Friday 20 Jan 2017 23:56:35 kdenis at posteo.de wrote:
> Dear pims,
> 
> I'd like arrange the second stage of my KDE PIM bug cleaning campaign. This
> time, I would close all KDE PIM bugs that have never been confirmed for a
> Frameworks-based version. I would skip the WAITINGFORINFO step and set them
> directly to UNMAINTAINED. Of course, I plan to leave a comment on every
> closed bug again, offering to reopen if the bug is still valid, and
> explaining the whole process.
> 
> A seemingly large portion of users still uses KDE PIM 4.14. The number of
> affected bugs would be huge as well. That's why I want to be extra sure that
> all PIM devs are OK with my plan.
> 
> I'll gladly take any feedback on this. If you think that closing those bugs
> is OK, does the same apply to wishes? Is this delicate enough to even
> discuss the wording of the closing comment? Or do I just worry way too
> much? ;)

I've reviewed all KAlarm bugs and closed those which are not still applicable, 
so please ignore KAlarm if you go ahead with what you propose.

-- 
David Jarvie.
KDE developer.
KAlarm author -- http://www.astrojar.org.uk/kalarm



More information about the kde-pim mailing list