[Differential] [Commented On] D1639: Implement opportunistic encryption

[dvratil (Daniel Vrátil)]

dvratil added a comment.


  In https://phabricator.kde.org/D1639#53750, @aheinecke wrote:
  
  > Hi,
  >
  > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D1639#53747, @dvratil wrote:
  >
  > > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D1639#53746, @aheinecke wrote:
  > >
  > > > I think we should untoggle encryption though if a recipient is selected for whom encryption is "Kleo::Impossible"
  > >
  > >
  > > You mean not encrypt the email at all if all the recipients are `Kleo::Impossible`, or even if only one is `Kleo::Impossible`?
  >
  >
  > Even if only one is Impossible. If the Key Selection dialog comes up we don't think its user friendly anymore. The goal is to be unobtrusive as possible by default and if a user wants to override that e.g. by explicitly encrypting to a key where the user ID does not match the mail he can still push the encrypt button.
  
  
  I implemented this and it seems to work well enough although it's rather fragile, because we have no way of knowing if we failed to get the key because the address is incomplete or because the address is complete but we simply don't have the key.

REPOSITORY
  R206 KMail

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D1639

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: dvratil, mlaurent, aheinecke
Cc: knauss, kde-pim, spencerb, dvasin, winterz, vkrause, mlaurent, dvratil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20160930/feb1b64b/attachment.html>