[Kde-pim] Bug triage?

[Martin Steigerwald]

Hi Vishesh, 

Am Samstag, 21. März 2015, 14:54:17 schrieb Vishesh Handa:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Martin Steigerwald
> <martin at lichtvoll.de>
> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2015, 13:57:54 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> > > … thats probably at least in part caused by me. :)
> > > 
> > > I closed quite some of my bug reports I didn´t see happening anymore
> > > since some time or that were related to Nepomuk stuff.
> > 
> > I wonder whether a bug triage for Akonadi + KMail related issues would
> > be beneficial. I think there may be quite more bug reports related to
> > Nepomuk and highly outdated Akonadi + KMail versions. Of course it
> > can also include the other KDEPIM applications, but maybe its good to
> > just focus on KMail + Akonadi as in my impression this combo still
> > has the most annoying issues.
> > 
> > It would be nice to have a developer or two around who can give hints
> > on what to suggest to provide as further input for bugs that require
> > it.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> As Sandro said, it's an incredibly important task, but someone needs to
> do it, as it will take a lot of time.
> 
> With Plasma we have been trying to keep the bug count low, and make it a
> priority that all bugs should be responded to within a week or so.

After as I wrote

[Akonadi] [Bug 343114] gets stuck on one request that times out, kmail and 
akonadiconsole do not display any mail payloads anymore, stuck waiting

also seems to be fixed now, I get a much better impression of KDEPIM. That 
really was a quite annoying bug.

Regarding a bug triage, I thought about a group effort, maybe a day on 
doing it. But, on the other hand, what I also can imagine triaging a few 
bugs a week. It seems to be a task that is easily splitable into smaller 
chunks. So I may just do a few bugs here and then, but I first would like 
to read on how to do it in a good way. For me own bug report I just 
closed, what I could not reproduce anymore, but for bug reports of others 
that doesn´t feel approbiate for me. So I would make a comment and say: I 
can´t reproduce, can you still reproduce it?

But regarding Nepomuk related stuff, what would be a good approach? I 
closed any performance related bug reports I made about KMail as Akonadi 
still used Nepomuk. About behavioral bugs I am not so sure.

Ciao,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/