[Kde-pim] New kcalcore maintainer

[Allen Winter]

I just released libical 2.0.0 the other day.  I tried to make sure
libical 2.0.0 maintained source compatibility -- although it is
not binary compatible.

Maybe we could ask the CI folks to upgrade their libical install to 2.0.0
so we can get it fully tested by kcalcore?

On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 06:49:14 PM Sandro Knauß wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Thanks for the warm welcome! Sergio also  thanks for mantaining kcalcore so 
> far - you did a good job.
> 
> I don't have plans for new features . I see kcalcore as a RFC implemention 
> around ical/vcal. And kcalcore sould do a great job in reading/writing this 
> format. But should not be the domain logic for korganizer. So things like the 
> the Observer should not be part of kcalcore in the long run. Also things like 
> SchedulingID/ notbeook are not part of the RFC and are purly korganizer driven 
> additions and should be removed.
> 
> One of the next projects for kcalcore is to port it to QDateTime, thanks John 
> Layt to starting with it. We sould get in conntact to not do the work twice :D
> 
> But on the other side I know, that kcalcore is one of the widly used pim libs, 
> that are also used outside of kdepim, so I will also focus much in a consitant 
> API, to not break external applications. Thats why I'll plan after porting 
> kcalcore to QDateTime is done and cleand up, you don't see the feature 
> deletion. This deletion will take place in a kcalcore2 and kcalcore will enter 
> in a bugfix only mode.
> 
> It would be great to get some connections to the applications, that use 
> kcalcore to discuss the further development with them. I know about kube, 
> zanshin, digikam, plama-workspace, what else?
> 
> > I guess this also includes akonadi-calendar, but I'll let Sandro answer 
> that, since he already has plans of how our calendaring stack will look like 
> in the future.
> 
> akonadi-calendar well I havn't thought about an agenda...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> sandro
> 
>  --
> Am Monday 28 December 2015, 21:40:50 schrieb John Layt:
> > On 28 December 2015 at 00:01, Allen Winter <allen.d.winter at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I started trying to remove kdelibs4support from kcalcore but got stuck
> > > porting KTimeZone stuff to QTimeZone.   too complicated for me.
> > 
> > I did start that porting work a while back too, you can see the WIP on
> > GitHub [1]. It's still very broken and very rough and I'm not sure some of
> > the decisions I've made are quite right, but I'm trying to get back to it
> > in the next few weeks.
> > 
> > John.
> > 
> > [1] https://github.com/jlayt/kcalcore/commits/kf5-port-qdatetime
> > _______________________________________________
> > KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
> > KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
> KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/