[Kde-pim] Review Request 120967: prevent failed ImapInterval interval overflow assertion

[René J.V. Bertin]

> On Nov. 4, 2014, 10:42 a.m., Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> > Sorry, the issue has actually already been fixed upstream. Please discard this review request.

Yes, indeed...


- René J.V.


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120967/#review69787
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 4, 2014, 11:03 a.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120967/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 4, 2014, 11:03 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDEPIM.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdepim-runtime
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This seems to resolve the issue I reported a bit earlier tonight:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614
> 
> The patch avoids the potential overflow by checking against the bounds before incrementing the interval's starting point (setBegin): see https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614#c5
> 
> I really couldn't resist correcting the spelling of the interval variables (from interval*l*) but had I foreseen it'd make the diff so hard to read I'd have done it in a second step...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   resources/imap/batchfetcher.h a666714 
>   resources/imap/batchfetcher.cpp f6b1310 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120967/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> On Kubuntu 14.04 with KDE 4.14.2 from the kubuntu-backports PPA; all kdepim packages built with clang-3.5
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> René J.V. Bertin
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/