[Kde-pim] Akonadi: single database design mistake?

[Martin Steigerwald]

Am Montag, 29. April 2013, 17:49:13 schrieb Kevin Krammer:
> On Monday, 2013-04-29, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > ianseeks wrote:
> > > My take on it would be that it should have been a configurable option to
> > > use Akonadi etc or to keep PIM working as it used to
> > 
> > That would require maintainers for the old and new pim applications. Take
> > a
> > look at the number of active pim developers and think about if this would
> > work or not. :)
> 
> Well, the sources of all releases are properly tagged, so it will always be
> possible to use a certain version.
> If there are enough interested parties a vendor will ship it.
> 
> If it is maintained by that vendor depends on the incentive for the vendor
> to do that.
> If we assume the story of lots of old-style PIM app users being around, that
> should be a given.

I rather spent my time in contributing my testing performance options, 
gathering performance data, to help to iron out still existing performance 
issues, now that my *fifth* migration attempt seemed to have worked. ;)

KDEPIM-2 received several years of development thats not in KDEPIM-1 and I 
want to benefit from these improvements.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/