[Kde-pim] Marketing blocker collection, DEADLINE: 2013-03-10

Lindsay Mathieson lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com
Thu Mar 7 09:54:45 GMT 2013


On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 11:28:08 AM Andras Mantia wrote:
>  Now if you recreated the database, but fail to update the filters, you can 
> mess up your data, true. But that does not mean the data is in the
> database, nor that it is the database the problem itself. It is the
> filtering code that starts to move mails to wrong folders.

I think we're discussing semantics here. I'm aware that the db is merely a 
cache of external data such as IMAP or mdir etc. And deleting it doesn't 
directly effect that data. 

But it can do so indirectly, which for most users will be equivalent. Perhaps 
this needs to be made more front and centre.

Would a tool for clearing the cache without actually deleting it make sense? 
could it be so done that folder id's were preserved?
-- 
Lindsay Mathieson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20130307/7abdc84e/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/


More information about the kde-pim mailing list