[Kde-pim] Review Request: properly honor resource when applying filters to new emails

[Ingo Klöcker]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102446/#review6517
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Apart from the below remark the patch looks good.


mailcommon/filtermanager.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102446/#comment5771>

    It probably doesn't matter that much, but since always the same resource will be used it might make sense to determine the resource just once (before the for-loop) instead of for each filter in the for-loop.


- Ingo


On Sept. 14, 2011, 12:16 p.m., Milian Wolff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102446/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 14, 2011, 12:16 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDEPIM.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This is most probably just a dirty "get it working" patch, but I want to post it here for review. First the problem it solves:
> 
> When starting kmail, it will apply all filters to all new emails without honoring the "apply this filter to incoming messages: from checked accounts only" setting.
> 
> The easiest way to notice is by having a "spamc" or spamassassin (or similar) filter that takes a long time and have that apply to only a very specific account. Then, when a different account gets new email you should see a load spike / spamc processes even though there should be none.
> 
> Imo the whole design of FilterManager::process's function signature is pretty bad. Shouldn't/couldn't the optional stuff be removed and item.parentCollection().resource() be used instead?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   mailcommon/filtermanager.h 68e162e 
>   mailcommon/filtermanager.cpp 7d0372e 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102446/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ran kmail2 for ~1 day. it finally worked like it should
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Milian
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/