[Kde-pim] Akonadi: single database design mistake?

[Andras Mantia]

Anders Lund wrote:

> On Tirsdag den 29. november 2011, Milian Wolff wrote:
>> I understand how this experience is far from optimal, but refrain from
>> spreading such FUD as the above. I also have lots of problems with KMail2
>> but  I actually sit down and try to fix them. Which so far works out
>> pretty well.
> 
> Expressions of worries and frustration is not FUD.
> 
> Not everybody is a developer (though this list is for developers, agreed),
> or wants to develop or debug kmail or akonadi. Does that make us undesired
> as users? Does it mean we can not express our worries?

The problem is when users who are not developer draw the wrong conclusion 
why this is unusable. In the situation described here the problem is the 
conversion and nothing else. Yes, a valid concern for the user as he cannot 
get forward, but telling this is because of the database, or because of X is 
FUD if the claim is not carefully verified.

Andras
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/