[Kde-pim] Akonadi: single database design mistake?

[Anders Lund]

On Tirsdag den 29. november 2011, Andras Mantia wrote:
> Anders Lund wrote:
> > On Tirsdag den 29. november 2011, Milian Wolff wrote:
> >> I understand how this experience is far from optimal, but refrain from
> >> spreading such FUD as the above. I also have lots of problems with
> >> KMail2 but  I actually sit down and try to fix them. Which so far works
> >> out pretty well.
> > 
> > Expressions of worries and frustration is not FUD.
> > 
> > Not everybody is a developer (though this list is for developers,
> > agreed), or wants to develop or debug kmail or akonadi. Does that make
> > us undesired as users? Does it mean we can not express our worries?
> 
> The problem is when users who are not developer draw the wrong conclusion
> why this is unusable. In the situation described here the problem is the
> conversion and nothing else. Yes, a valid concern for the user as he cannot
> get forward, but telling this is because of the database, or because of X
> is FUD if the claim is not carefully verified.

It is a concern from someone who actually wants to use kmail, and is very 
frustrated that it is not possible. Even if wrong, the concern is valid, and 
it is raised here, in the hope that it helps developers in finding solutions.

-- 
Anders
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/