[Kde-pim] Re: (sysadmin work?)
Ingo Klöcker
kloecker at kde.org
Fri Feb 11 20:43:02 GMT 2011
On Friday 11 February 2011, Marc Deop wrote:
> On Friday 11 February 2011 14:16:00 Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I am afraid I don't understand. How is the imap idle thing
> > different? We close it as resolved once we have it resolved.
>
> So i inderstand kmail1 will no longer be developed? not even the
> enterprise branch?
>
> The thing is that in another bugzilla (maemo/meego) they mark this
> kind of things as solved in the new release even though it's not out
> there yet. That's why I asked for the sysadmins to set a kmail 2
> tag.
Where is this needed? For "Version Fixed In"?
> So we keep all this bugs open even though they're solved until the
> release actually sees the light? (no offense, I'm just asking).
No. We have always set bugs to fixed as soon as they have been fixed in
the development version. We never waited for the next release to be out
of the door and I see no reason to change this.
Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20110211/bf6f9554/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
More information about the kde-pim
mailing list