[Kde-pim] jargon is bad! :)

[Paul James Adams]

On Tuesday 16 Mar 2010 08:46:16 Thomas McGuire wrote:
> That's the problem. The user might be using Mailody or LionMail. If there
> was only Kontact, I'd agree.

But this is not an unsurmountable problem... All we need is for the mail 
application in question to provide feedback to the user, instead of Akonadi.

In my mind (forgive me if I am wrong here) Akonadi is a service and therefore 
should not be presenting information to the user. It should be presenting its 
status to the applications which are using it.

So if something goes wrong with Akonadi, KMail users get a message that is 
meaningful to them. Similarly, Mailody users can get a message meaningful to 
them.

-- 
Paul J. Adams
KDE Research - KDE e.V.

e: paul.adams at kde.org
w: http://www.kde.org

GPG: 8996 74F6 Paul James Adams
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20100316/18aacdc1/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/