[Kde-pim] migrating from KMail1 to KMail2 (and back?)
Sebastian Kügler
sebas at kde.org
Thu Jun 17 13:13:42 BST 2010
Hi,
[readding opensuse-kde list in CC:]
On Thursday 17 June 2010 13:52:29 Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Thursday, 2010-06-17, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 June 2010 13:22:39 Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 2010-06-17, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > > > - Is the migration process destructive, so after migration, the
> > > > KMail1 config + cached data is gone?
> > >
> > > The migration process itself is only destructive on the user's choice.
> > > I.e. when migrating disconnected IMAP accouts, users are presented with
> > > the option to either keep the old cache or deleting it after import.
> >
> > Alright, I understood that (roughly) from your other emails on this
> > subject. What is the default here?
>
> This is a question message box with two options, delete old cache being
> the active/default button, ESC triggering "keep".
> I could add another config option to not ask but always keep though.
Is this per folder? (I have 60 folders, and I'm sure some of the audience here
has even more. That might result in an exercise in RSI if I have to check
something for every migrated folder (and I can't make up valid enough use-
cases where you'd want to keep parts of your cache only).
The thing that most users want is probably "keep old data around for some time
until I know kmail2 works for me". That's essentially "keep old data", but
with an option to clean up later. Not sure how to implement that cleanly
(maybe as something that runs when we ship 12.0, though.)
That's something we can flip in our shipped packages, so you guys don't worry
too much about this at this point. :)
> > > However, after migration, i.e. when using the new setup, certain
> > > portions of the old KMail setup (metadata) might become invalid due to
> > > folders being modified and thus making the KMail index files "too
> > > old".
> >
> > Is this reported by KMail then, or what will happen?
>
> AFAIK, KMail will check the timestamp before it attemps loading. If the
> index is to old it is ignored and rebuilt.
Sounds perfectly robust, as no user intervention is needed. Cool :-)
Cheers,
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
More information about the kde-pim
mailing list