[Kde-pim] Git and the needs of KDE PIM
Josef Kufner
jk at myserver.cz
Thu Jan 14 10:32:48 GMT 2010
Patrick Ohly píše v Čt 14. 01. 2010 v 09:59 +0100:
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 19:54 +0000, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > The "blocked" commits issue poses bigger problems I think. My knowledge of
> > the internals of git is not strong, but I don't think it would be possible
> > to identify commits to keep only in one branch and not merge with the rest.
>
> What you could do is a "git merge --no-commit". Then look at all changes
> that would be committed and revert those that are not wanted in the
> branch that is getting merged into. Commit. The next "git merge" will
> only merge changes made since the last merge, so this manual selection
> only needs to be done once per patch.
>
> Disclaimer: haven't tried this myself.
I thing, it would be better to do merge without '--no-commit' and then
revert those commits that are not wanted. So everyone will see in log
what patches are not merged. Question is, if we wish to see that.
--
Josef Kufner <jk at myserver.cz>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20100114/200b430d/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
More information about the kde-pim
mailing list