[Kde-pim] Reply to Author != Reply to Author ?

[Martin Koller]

On Thursday 01 October 2009 13:54:08 David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 01 October 2009, Tom Albers wrote:
> > From what I understand from this thread, bugzilla messages are ok:
> > reply -> takes the reply-to header -> bug-control at bugs.kde.org
> > 
> > reply-to-author -> takes the reply-to-header too, which is wrong and should
> >  be fixed and that's what Martin and Thomas sugested.
>  
> Well, AFAIU that would break the case where the _author_ sets a Reply-To:
> field (because he wants incoming mail on a specific address, or whatever).
> That's the problem here: we use Reply-To for bugzilla emails, but instead we
> should use whatever mailing-lists usually use.

No, I think that's not correct.

kmail offers 2 kinds of reply (which we are talking about here):

reply - should use whatever the mail tells kmail to use or kmail finds "smart"

reply to author - _I_ as the user of kmail command the program to explicitely reply
  to the author directly, explicitely ignoring what the author wants in a reply-to
  header.

The author can not avoid that I send him directly a mail, as I can simply create a
new mail with his address directly given.

So, kmail shall simply follow my command.

-- 
Best regards/Schöne Grüße

Martin    ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail 
          /\                        - against microsoft attachments

Geschenkideen, Accessoires, Seifen, Kulinarisches: www.bibibest.at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20091001/5b322641/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/