[Kde-pim] KDE/kdepimlibs

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Monday 18 February 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 18 February 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
> > Op Monday 18 February 2008 23:02 schreef u:
> > > On Monday 18 February 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
> > > > Because we decided people with KDE 4.0 packages should be able
> > > > to work on KDEPIM/KDEPIMLIBS.
> > >
> > > That's nice for the developers (seriously), but does it actually
> > > match with the rest of KDE development, especially for kdepimlibs
> > > ?
> >
> > Up to now it does. I'm not saying we can keep it that way up to the
> > 4.1 release, but it would be good to maintain it for a while more.
> >
> > > It is required for building kdebase, and as such it must be able
> > > to build against trunk I'd say.
> >
> > Sure. But also with 4.0 ;-)
>
> You want that, and that's seriously very good for the developers.
> But I think we didn't have a rule like this in KDE beore ?

Not in (all of) KDE. But we did have the rule that kdepim-trunk should 
be able to build against the latest stable kdelibs for a very long time 
in KDE PIM.


Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20080219/8b107981/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/