[Kde-pim] Request to exclude KMail from the KDE 4.0 release

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Sunday 16 December 2007, Thorsten Stärk wrote:
> On Saturday 15 December 2007 19:37:40 Thomas McGuire wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 10 December 2007, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > > On Sunday 09 December 2007, Thomas McGuire wrote:
> > > > branch. I also wouldn't work on the encryption stuff, as the
> > > > KDAB people already work on that (it seems).
> > >
> > > Signing, Encryping and Decrypting using OpenPGP works, check of
> > > signatures doesn't.
> >
> > Well, that is at least something :)
> >
> > > > For the editor stuff, these things need to be done properly,
> > > > maybe even moving some functions from KMCompseWin to KMeditor.
> > > > Now is the only chance to get the design right.
> > > >
> > > > As for side-effects (the code in KMail is a bit complicated in
> > > > places), reviewing the patches will certainly help.
> > >
> > > The first part of the patch connects the AFAIK correct slot for
> > > explicit spell checking. This was a QObject::connect warning
> > > before.
> > >
> > > Checking seems to work, but I couldn't find where the text for
> > > the statusbar comes from because it isn't reset properly after
> > > finishing the check :(
> > >
> > > Second part would in theory toggle automatic spellchecking,
> > > however it stays disabled since acceptRichText() is true and in
> > > this case KTextEditor does not call createHighlighter().
> > >
> > > In any case KMeditor::createHighlighter() instaniates its own
> > > email highlighter, which has a Sonnet include but does not seem
> > > to use it.
> >
> > I can't answer your questions here, as I know nothing about how the
> > spell checking things work. I hope you somehow figure it out.
> > I'd say commit the corrected connect, it can't be worse than
> > before.
>
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83423 - "disable as-you-type
> spell checking in all of KDE" has 300 votes although it is closed.
>
> I can only say it is ridiculous that all person's names in your
> emails show up red and you do not know why at first. As stated in the
> bug, please remove it

No.


Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20071216/e68d67fe/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/