[Kde-perl] Problems with the QUrlOperator class...

[Thomas Fjellstrom]

On January 5, 2004 05:09 pm, Germain Garand wrote:
> Le Lundi 05 Janvier 2004 23:05, Thomas Fjellstrom a écrit :
> > > so my hint would be:
> > > perl -we "Qt::GlobalSpace::qInitNetworkProtocols"
> > >
> > > :-)
> >
> > Well without -MQt I get "Undefined Subroutine...", with -MQt, It returns
> > with no errors or warnings...
>
> without modifications (parentheses() or leading &), that should be
> "Useless use of a constant in void context at -e line 1."
> (i.e: not a subroutine call at all, which was my guess about what could
> have gone wrong)
>
> > I call "Qt::GlobalSpace::qInitNetworkProtocols();" in the main file of my
> > program, the one that first "use Qt"s...
>
> ah, so that rules my hypothesis off...
>
> > Would I have to call that function
> > in other modules??
>
> no, one time is enough. Before creating the QUrlOperator is probably a good
> idea indeed.
>
> > nope.. Just tried calling Qt::GlobalSpace::qInitNetworkProtocols();
> > before creating a QUrlOperator... Didn't help a bit. :(
>
> so... can you send a short, complete testcase?
> what is the output of (the relevant part) of your testcase running under
> -MQt::debug=all?
> is yourQt compiled with
> QT_NO_NETWORKPROTOCOL_FTP/QT_NO_NETWORKPROTOCOL_HTTP? (that would be very
> strange but who knows... try running smoke/qt/qtguess.pl -t 0 and look at
> the status of the define for QT_NO_NETWORKPROTOCOL_FTP)

Lets just say that I'm an idiot. I assumed a QUrlOperator would outlive a 
my... but why would it? heh. Yup. I my'ed it, so it died before it had a 
chance to get the page. funny no?

Still want the test case? ;)

> Germain


-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom at strangesoft.net
http://strangesoft.net