[Kde-perl] Short term plans

[Rob]

On Thursday 05 December 2002 12:30, Germain Garand wrote:
> Qt::KDE::Application wouldn't be too hard to do and could still use a
> common Smoke I think ...
> That would ne a nice namespace tree
> IMHO, much better that having separate Qt and KDE modules. What do you
> think ?

Seeing as how a whole lot of KDE classes inherit Qt classes, it's not lik=
e you=20
could install a KDE module *without* the Qt module, so this seems like a=20
smarter namespace than putting KDE at the top level.

Rob