Compiling version 0.2 on Fedora 7

[Ryan Daly]

On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 01:07 +0100, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> On Thursday, 22. November 2007, Ryan Daly wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 21:51 +0100, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 21. November 2007, Beso wrote:
> > > > the patch works fine with 1.0_pre6, which i have installed and
> > > > applies very well on its source. this is made because the
> > > > 1.0_pre6 has changed some functions and many programs still call
> > > > in the old functions. the 1.0_pre5 also had something modified
> > > > for suse (since knm was developed as a suse project) for what
> > > > i've learned (but for this assertion maybe some other dev could
> > > > help confirm that) and needs a patch for other distros.
> > >
> > > Problem here is that the ebuild called "1.0_pre6" is not actually
> > > pre6, but a state after pre5 and before the release of pre6. As far
> > > as the API parts KNM uses, it is "pre5".
> > >
> > > If you want to, please open a bug about this and cc me on it.
> > > Because right now, we might not have a version of libnl that will
> > > support the new knm release in vanilla state.
> >
> > Bug is filed.
> >
> > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152675
> 
> With my comment I meant to file against the libnl maintainer in Gentoo 
> for including a wrongly names tarball :-)

Sorry.

I'll let a Gentoo user file that bug since I'm not using that flavor of
Linux.
--