Compiling version 0.2 on Fedora 7

[Robert Buchholz]

On Thursday, 22. November 2007, Ryan Daly wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 21:51 +0100, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 21. November 2007, Beso wrote:
> > > the patch works fine with 1.0_pre6, which i have installed and
> > > applies very well on its source. this is made because the
> > > 1.0_pre6 has changed some functions and many programs still call
> > > in the old functions. the 1.0_pre5 also had something modified
> > > for suse (since knm was developed as a suse project) for what
> > > i've learned (but for this assertion maybe some other dev could
> > > help confirm that) and needs a patch for other distros.
> >
> > Problem here is that the ebuild called "1.0_pre6" is not actually
> > pre6, but a state after pre5 and before the release of pre6. As far
> > as the API parts KNM uses, it is "pre5".
> >
> > If you want to, please open a bug about this and cc me on it.
> > Because right now, we might not have a version of libnl that will
> > support the new knm release in vanilla state.
>
> Bug is filed.
>
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152675

With my comment I meant to file against the libnl maintainer in Gentoo 
for including a wrongly names tarball :-)


Robert

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-networkmanager/attachments/20071122/fba926c3/attachment.pgp