The great KDEMM migration

Trever Fischer tdfischer at fedoraproject.org
Fri Mar 16 21:11:30 GMT 2012


On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 00:54 +0100, Christian Esken (KDE) wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:47:17 -0400, Trever Fischer 
>  <tdfischer at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Its taken a long while to get all the repositories done due to a
> > combination of long runtimes and subsequently forgetting to check up 
> > on
> > them.
> 
>  Thanks for your effort, Trever. :-)
>  And by the way, it is really time to thank also everybody else involved 
>  in
>  the toolchain, migration and so forth.
> 
>  Its great to see it all in shape.
> 
> >
> > http://wm161.net/git/
> 
> 
> > Above, you will find all the kde-multimedia modules in git form. They
> > were uploaded to my own hosting because the git.kde.org hooks weren't
> > happy. I would appreciate it if someone else (hopefully the relevant
> > maintainers) could poke around in them and see if I missed anything. 
> > I
> > realize that tags are missing for most of the repos, which can be a 
> > easy
> > manual fix unless someone wants to invent proper rules.
> 
>  I have not yet pulled the KMix git yet, but looked at the structure 
>  first.
>  KMix folder looks fine so far, but I wonder how we proceed with the 
>  Toplevel
>  doc/ folder. All the time we discussed GIT migration I never had the 
>  doc
>  folder on my mind.
> 
>  Should the content be moved to the individual appplications? Or does 
>  this
>  clash with the translator workflow? I really do have not a clue.

I currently have the doc/ folder in its own repo. Merging repos (or
parts of repos) is super easy and a contingency plan in case that needs
to happen.

> 
>  Greetings,
>      Christian
> 



More information about the kde-multimedia mailing list