The great KDEMM migration
Trever Fischer
tdfischer at fedoraproject.org
Fri Mar 16 21:11:30 GMT 2012
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 00:54 +0100, Christian Esken (KDE) wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:47:17 -0400, Trever Fischer
> <tdfischer at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Its taken a long while to get all the repositories done due to a
> > combination of long runtimes and subsequently forgetting to check up
> > on
> > them.
>
> Thanks for your effort, Trever. :-)
> And by the way, it is really time to thank also everybody else involved
> in
> the toolchain, migration and so forth.
>
> Its great to see it all in shape.
>
> >
> > http://wm161.net/git/
>
>
> > Above, you will find all the kde-multimedia modules in git form. They
> > were uploaded to my own hosting because the git.kde.org hooks weren't
> > happy. I would appreciate it if someone else (hopefully the relevant
> > maintainers) could poke around in them and see if I missed anything.
> > I
> > realize that tags are missing for most of the repos, which can be a
> > easy
> > manual fix unless someone wants to invent proper rules.
>
> I have not yet pulled the KMix git yet, but looked at the structure
> first.
> KMix folder looks fine so far, but I wonder how we proceed with the
> Toplevel
> doc/ folder. All the time we discussed GIT migration I never had the
> doc
> folder on my mind.
>
> Should the content be moved to the individual appplications? Or does
> this
> clash with the translator workflow? I really do have not a clue.
I currently have the doc/ folder in its own repo. Merging repos (or
parts of repos) is super easy and a contingency plan in case that needs
to happen.
>
> Greetings,
> Christian
>
More information about the kde-multimedia
mailing list