Phonon - Qt or KDE?
Trever Fischer
tdfischer at fedoraproject.org
Mon Nov 14 12:40:18 GMT 2011
On Sunday, November 13, 2011 04:00:34 PM Harald Sitter wrote:
> I hope by now the extent of moving is pretty clear.
>
> It implies nothing but the infrastructure. The present Phonon team would
> still be in charge etc.
>
> So, this is really a very simple question IMHO, there is no particular
> attachment coming with a move to qtproject. If people start messing with my
> code, we could still move back :P
>
> As I pointed out yesterday to Michael on IRC, all this appears to be much
> less a question of infrastructure A vs. B (where B seems supperior on a
> technical level at the time of writing), but really the fundamental
> question underneath all that.
>
> Is Phonon a KDELibs project that just happens to bet qt-only because Qt
> wanted to adopt it, or is it a Qt project that happens to primarily
> deliver to KDE?
>
> Now, in the early days it clearly was former. However in recent times I do
> believe that there is quite a shift to the latter. I certainly do not make
> decisions on what benefits KDE as soon as possible, but rather what pays of
> best for all of Qt MM in the long term.
>
> That is really the crux here. The POV essentially dictates a lot of things.
> If it is KDE and happens to be Qt software then we'd live on KDE and
> primarily target KDE, if it works for others -> all the better. If it is
> Qt and happens to deliver to KDE then it would make a whole lot of sense
> to move to qtproject and continue to thrive there.
>
> Therefore I am proposing a new question. Is Phonon KDE or is it Qt?
I would like to see Phonon be Qt. I can see a number of applications for
Phonon (hint: my employer is one major instance) that don't require a full-
fledged desktop framework and whatever other crazy awesome stuff the Frameworks
bring.
Just my $0.02; I'm not really someone who pays attention to where phonon shows
up and how exactly one might cater better to KDE vs Qt. I think this question
is much better answered by outside people, especially those who don't work on
phonon.
>
> (Just to be sure: the community behind it certainly is KDE, but is the
> software itself?).
>
> BR
--
Trever Fischer (tdfischer)
Fedora Ambassador, KDE Hacker
http://wm161.net
GPG: C40F2998 hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-multimedia/attachments/20111114/c797ede2/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
kde-multimedia mailing list
kde-multimedia at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-multimedia
More information about the kde-multimedia
mailing list