Comparison: MAS, GStreamer, NMM

[Charles Samuels]

On Friday 27 August 2004 12:33 am, Marco Lohse wrote:
> well, for NMM, that is only partly true. From the point of software
> desgin, we did care about portability: All platform dependent code is
> completely abstracted and therefore hidden within classes. So there is
> no inherent portability problem.
>
> The only reason NMM is currently only supported on Linux is quite
> simple: the NMM team only has access to Linux systems (PCs or ARM PDA,
> e.g. Compaq iPAQ). If someone is willing to help with the support for
> other platforms, you are heavily welcome.

When the code quality is as high as NMM's (IMO), porting won't be a difficult 
procedure.  Anyway, we'll have the entire release cycle of KDE 4 to work out 
portability.

-Charles

-- 
Charles Samuels <charles at kde.org>
 Don't change horsemen in the middle of an apocalypse!