[KDE/Mac] Question about goal of Windows/Mac frameworks

Marko Käning mk-lists at mailbox.org
Thu Oct 22 17:27:56 UTC 2015

Hi René,

On 22 Oct 2015, at 19:24 , René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Not exactly, no. The patch was rejected in the presented form, but we were invited to file a bug report (I think it's https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-44473). Here we (me, IIRC) managed to make the case for special needs by MacPorts and family.
> My understanding is that the door is still open for a QSP patch that does not alter the default QSP behaviour, which is exactly what my patch does (i.e. it requires activation).

ok, you're right.

>> Could it be, that we have to introduce a QSP patch in MacPorts’ qt5-mac to revert back to the Linuxy way of XDG paths?
> Have you forgotten I'm working on that, and that I actually created a qt5-kde port so that (y)our KF5 ports could depend on a port with the required patch(es) and install layout?

How could I forget that? ;-) I was merely trying to trigger the discussion!


More information about the kde-mac mailing list