[KDE/Mac] Preparing the QSP patch for KDE CI

[Jeremy Whiting]

I think my strategy is to point to use cases where this feature is
required. If they aren't open to these kinds of changes I'll ask how we
would go about making these automated tests work without this feature. I
think showing a use case is enough to convince them that this feature would
be useful.

BR,
Jeremy

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Marko Käning <mk-lists at email.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> following up our IRC discussion on this I would like to clarify
> how you’re going to argument that we want to push XDG_DATA_DIRS
> as a new feature for OSX’ QSP code.
>
> Only this morning I realised that Thiago was quite clear about
> that such patch for our CI isn’t something he’d like to see
> promoted. He considers testing apps in their default locations
> as the only way to go.
>
> What’s your strategy?
>
> Greets,
> Marko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-mac/attachments/20141219/64f0bb3f/attachment.html>