[kde-linux] JPEG 7 vs KDE-4.4 (DLL HELL comes to Linux?)
jrtyrer at earthlink.net
Wed Mar 10 17:42:48 UTC 2010
Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2010-03-10, James Tyrer wrote:
>> I have an interesting issue which appears to be an obscure bug or a
>> build system issue. I updated Firefox and needed to upgrade a bunch of
>> stuff first.
>> I installed: "jpeg-7", but I did not remove version 6.2 pending
>> rebuilding other packages. I did rebuild KDESupport and the KDE-4.4
>> BRANCH tree.
>> When I open Konqueror, it opens fine but when I open a web page (e.g.
>> www.kde.org) it crashes without the KDE crash dialog appearing.
>> So, I opened it in a Konsole. I get this error message:
>> konqueror(32716)/kio (Slave) KIO::Slave::createSlave: createSlave "http"
>> for KUrl("http://www.kde.org/images/teaser/js-jam.jpg")
>> konqueror(32716)/kio (KIOConnection)
>> KIO::ConnectionServer::listenForRemote: Listening on
>> Wrong JPEG library version: library is 70, caller expects 62
> Would be interesting where this output comes from.
Yes it would. What I can't understand is that if something is linked
against the older JPEG library, why doesn't it just use it.
> Can you check if both JPEG libraries have different so-names and whether you
> have a .so symlink pointing to either one?
[root at localhost lib]# ls -l libjpeg.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 247278 Mar 8 11:21 libjpeg.a
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 913 Mar 8 11:21 libjpeg.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Mar 8 11:21 libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.7.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Aug 3 2009 libjpeg.so.62 ->
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 140777 Aug 3 2009 libjpeg.so.62.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Mar 8 11:21 libjpeg.so.7 -> libjpeg.so.7.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 229176 Mar 8 11:21 libjpeg.so.7.0.0
Looks correct to me.
Linux (mostly) From Scratch
More information about the kde-linux