[kde-linux] Goodbye
Christopher Roy Bratusek
zanghar at freenet.de
Sat Nov 14 22:37:48 UTC 2009
Am Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:16:28 -0700
schrieb "David J Iannucci" <xqryvahkzy at punchcutter.ml1.net>:
> > I'm sticking with KDE 3.5 at least until things are working in KDE
> > 4. I do agree tho that even my machine is a bit slower than I would
> > like. KDE 4 needs a fast machine to work and respond the way KDE
> > 3.5 does.
>
> I'm also a Gentoo user, and since they have recently announced that
> 3.5 will be removed from portage and that as a result it will get a
> lot more bothersome to try to stick with it, I was thinking I'd just
> bite the bullet and upgrade, hoping that this was happening because
> things had really improved to the point of usability, but this thread
> is not encouraging.
>
> I thought one of the "hype points" about 4.x was that the code base
> was significantly rewritten to be smaller-footprint, faster, stabler,
> more efficient for older hardware. Was this just a load of c**p?
>
> Now I'm starting to think I should look into learning what I need to
> know (Gentoo overlays) in order to stay with 3.5....
>
> Dave
>
> p.s. I did have another specific question, actually, that I might as
> well stick in here: for a long time I've been using an "outside"
> WM with KDE - icewm. Does 4.x continue to make it fairly easy to do
> this, or does it really expect you to be using kwin?
It's not difficult to use a different WM, I described that on my hp.
(I'm not using KDE though, instead (obviously) Sawfish stand-alone.)
http://www.nanolx.org/newskde/20-kcc-wm
Chris
> ___________________________________________________
> This message is from the kde-linux mailing list.
> Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-linux.
> Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
> More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde-linux
mailing list