[kde-linux] KDE 3 Beta
James Richard Tyrer
tyrerj at acm.org
Sat Nov 10 21:02:27 UTC 2007
david wrote:
> James Richard Tyrer wrote:
>> david wrote:
>>> James Richard Tyrer wrote:
>>>> Anne Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday 28 Oct 2007, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
>>>>>> Perhaps you miss my point, or perhaps I wasn't clear. I have no
>>>>>> objection to any of the development work that is being done and I
>>>>>> do not
>>>>>> want any of it changed. What I do think is that somehow we need to
>>>>>> also
>>>>>> release a more stable product that is of commercial production
>>>>>> quality.
>>>>>> There are companies and governments which rely on our DeskTop and we
>>>>>> need to provide them with a high quality product. I see a simple
>>>>>> way to
>>>>>> do this: the stable release should not have new stuff added to it
>>>>>> until
>>>>>> the new stuff meets quality standards. Our current development
>>>>>> methodology makes this impossible.
>>>>> The truth is that there are two very different camps. One camp
>>>>> wants the latest and greatest. The other camp wants stability at
>>>>> any price. That camp uses Enterprise releases.
>>>> I am in basic agreement with that idea. That is why I propose two
>>>> releases stable and unstable.
>>> The "other camp" is in a different situation than Joe Ordinary User.
>>> If Joe's system won't come up after an update - oh, well. But if you
>>> are IT director keeping vital corporate databases alive on a server -
>>> you can't afford to have that server crash because of some error in an
>>> update.
>>>
>>> But, anyway, I thought that's why there were branches of Linux such as
>>> Stable and Testing/Unstable?
>>>
>> Yes but ... (tm).
>>
>> Yes, that is the way that Kernel development works, but it is not the
>> way that KDE development works.
>>
>> KDE does not supply such a stable KDE branch.
>
> Why not?
>
Isn't that the question that I am asking? Why doesn't KDE supply an
actual stable release?
>> So, are we leaving it up
>> to others to fix the bugs? Is this occurring -- I doubt it.
>
> Is what occurring - bug fixes? Others doing bug fixes and the KDE
> developers NOT doing bug fixes? Sorry, it's Thursday here and I'm
> seriously short of sleep!
>
Distros fix bugs. Should we leave it to the distros to fix the bugs?
Unfortunatly, many of these fixes are distro specific.
--
JRT
More information about the kde-linux
mailing list