Review process for translations

[Frederik Schwarzer]

On Friday, April 29, 2022 12:01:15 AM CEST Chusslove Illich wrote:
>  > [: Frederik Schwarzer :]
>  > I am a bit concerned about switching over to a more
>  > Pology-driven
>  > workflow since it seem a bit unmaintained. It's still written in
>  > Python 2, the website contains dead links etc. ...
> 
> 
> What dead links? ;)

Did you just fix it? I am certain, one link sent me to SVN earlier 
today and now it points to invent.k.o.


> (Seriously: Karl Ove actually already updated
> the links in the repository, so I had only to run the site-update
> script.) 
> It is true that Pology is somewhat unmaintained, in the sense that
> I didn't touch it for a long time. But outright bugs I'm still
> inclined to fix. Not that many are reported.

I did not want to imply that Pology was in bad shape. It works just 
fine in daily use. :)


> Regarding conversion to Python 3, in the past year I did have to
> move a lot of (non-KDE related) stuff from Python 2 to 3, so I
> hope I can get to looking into the Python 3 branch mentioned by
> Luigi at some not too distant point in time.

That would be great, thanks. :)

Cheers,
Frederik