[Kde-hardware-devel] Re: UDev subsystems whitelist

[Kevin Ottens]

On Monday 3 January 2011 23:10:06 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 07:45 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > I've been wondering about firewire as well, but so far I don't see any
> > use for it, the few cases relevant for our frontend api are caught by
> > udisks afaik (it's about storage). I'm not aware of cameras using it in
> > the wild, so we should be safe leaving it out.
> 
> Maybe we can add it in 4,6 and comment it in trunk so we have 6 month
> more for testing.

Well, I'd apply YAGNI[*] there. ;-)
So leave the situation as it is now, and in case it's needed (mainly by user 
requests) then we'll add it later.

Regards.

[*] You Aren't Gonna Need It.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-hardware-devel/attachments/20110104/d29de601/attachment.sig