[Kde-hardware-devel] Solid UDisks backend

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On July 26, 2010, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Really makes no sense to go through kdereview in this case, especially as
> such backends basically require knowledge of the lib itself, which means
> the people which are on this list. kdereview wouldn't buy us much.

also remember that a solid backend is:

* not exposed publicly, making changes to it trivial later (even removal)

* does not do i18n

* does not require user documentation

together with what Kevin said, that eliminates all of the reasons for putting 
something through kdereview, imo.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-hardware-devel/attachments/20100726/329c1194/attachment.sig