[Kde-hardware-devel] Solid UDisks backend

[Kevin Ottens]

On Monday 26 July 2010 09:49:48 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> I'm not asking the lib going back into kdereview, i'm asking the backend
> going through kdereview.

OK, I guess the point you're missing is that they're not plugins. So that's 
effectively the whole lib you'd need to review such a backend (just like 
kdecore/auth/backends for instance).

Really makes no sense to go through kdereview in this case, especially as such 
backends basically require knowledge of the lib itself, which means the people 
which are on this list. kdereview wouldn't buy us much.

Don't take me wrong, kdereview is great in the general case, but for a corner 
case like this one I'm not keen on generating bureaucracy work for the sake of 
it.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-hardware-devel/attachments/20100726/cf9b4840/attachment.sig