[Kde-hardware-devel] Solid UDisks backend

[Michael Zanetti]

On Sunday 25 July 2010 16:49:52 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Diumenge, 25 de juliol de 2010, Michael Zanetti va escriure:
> > On Sunday 25 July 2010 16:27:34 Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Alle domenica 25 luglio 2010, Michael Zanetti ha scritto:
> > > > As decided at akademy's solid BoF I have started implementing the
> > > > UDisks backend for solid. Today I have commited my initial work to
> > > > trunk. It still lacks a lot of things (some properties and most of
> > > > the StorageAccess stuff) but provides already a lot of querying suff
> > > > for storage devices. I'm committing this for you to test and
> > > > proof-read and tell me if I'm on the right track.
> > > 
> > > Why in trunk directly and not in some branch for later review?
> > > Where is that written that you were working on that? Why I have the
> > > feeling that who was not at akademy has not been made aware of almost
> > > anything...
> > 
> > I've committed to trunk because ervin thought it wouldn't be necessary to
> > go through some other review instace because he would review it anyways
> > in trunk.
> 
> So ervin is the only person that reviews things that end up in kdereview
> now? That's news to me.
> 

IIRC the explanation was that solid has already a well-defined and stable api, 
and there aren't too many things to do wrong in a backend implementation that 
basically just queries D-Bus similar to the other backends. So early testing 
in trunk would be better than only reviewing it outside.

Anyways, I'll re-check with ervin and move it out from trunk as soon as I know 
more.

Michael Zanetti wrote:
> Pino Toscano wrote:
> > [...] Why I have the
> > feeling that who was not at akademy has not been made aware of almost
> > anything...
> 
> Actually I thought it would have been written in techbase but is seems it
> got lost in between the notes at akademy and the final techbase page
> update... I should have checked that earlier... sorry.
> 

Now that I have double-checked... It is actually written on techbase [1]. Down 
at the bottom. It's actually pretty small. I guess I would have missed it 
too...

[1] http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Solid/Meetings/Akademy2010

Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-hardware-devel/attachments/20100725/7aec27a6/attachment.sig