[Kde-graphics-devel] ksnapshot: KIPI_FOUND?

Gilles Caulier caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Sat Nov 29 22:51:32 UTC 2014


There are not too much difference between master and frameworks from
API, as KUrl to QUrl, and path() to url().

lib is mostly ported and work, some plugins too, and at least
helloworld plugin ready for tests in client KIPI applications.

Look KF5 port wiki page for details :

https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Digikam/CodingSprint2014#KDE_Framework_Port

Gilles Caulier

2014-11-29 23:46 GMT+01:00 Gregor Mi <codestruct at posteo.org>:
> On 08/11/14 12:57, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> On Saturday, November 8, 2014 11.01:41 Gregor Mi wrote:
>>> On 03/11/14 19:17, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, November 2, 2014 18.49:33 Gregor Mi wrote:
>>>>> when you built ksnapshot, was KIPI_FOUND defined? I installed
>>>>> libkipi-devel but KIPI_FOUND was not set. So is this macro still in use?
>>>>
>>>> Which branch? master should find and use kipi. For the frameworks branch,
>>>> however, I am not aware of a Qt5 port of libkipi (master is Qt4 based and
>>>> there is no frameworks branch) so the Frameworks 5 version of ksnapshot
>>>> does not yet use kipi.
>>>
>>> I used the frameworks branch.
>>
>> aha ... that would explain it.
>>
>>> What would you suggest that should be done with the review request [Fill
>>> SendTo menu async to fix "Bug 312495 - Very slow 'Send to'
>>> menu"](https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120920/) which also affects
>>> kipi code? Let it rest until kipi is ported Qt5 or try to apply it on
>>> the Qt4 master?
>>
>> As I wrote in my review on the request, I think this could eventually go into
>> both master (where it is easier to test and can benefit people using the 4.x
>> version) and frameworks. Little should need to be changed in the patch between
>> the two branches.
>> If you don't have kdelibs 4.x available on your system to develop against let
>> me know and I can do it ...
>
> Thanks for the explanation. I have the kdelibs 4.x available and I put some time into
> backporting the current review request also for 4.x but I did not succeed. There are too
> many differences beween master and frameworks. So I would stick to frameworks for now. I
> assume you did not have the time to look into the latest version of the request yet? :)
>
> Gregor
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-graphics-devel mailing list
> Kde-graphics-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-graphics-devel


More information about the Kde-graphics-devel mailing list