[Kde-games-devel] svg-diamond deck, what now?

[Matthew Woehlke]

Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 02:57, Matthew Woehlke  wrote:
>> Sigh, you have to see it to trust me that it looks bad? ;-) Anyway, it
>> will have to wait for Monday probably.
>> [...]
>> (I'd also ask how Oxygen made it so long without raising these
>> complaints... and politely suggest that maybe there's a reason it's the
>> way it is :-). After all, I didn't do anything but change the colors
>> around a bit, and reversing the gradients was /not/ part of what I tweaked.)
> 
> I am not saying I don't trust you. I just asked to be able to see for
> myself. Tastes _do_ differ, sometimes :)

I guess it's not quite as "inherently bad" as I first thought... but I 
still dislike it pretty strongly. A big part of that is that switching 
the gradient throws off all the effort at making the black suits similar 
enough to be quickly recognized as "black".

At any rate, I still think that there's nothing wrong with the gradient 
darker on top, and I still prefer it that way :-).

-- 
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
-- 
We are Microsoft. What you are experiencing is not a problem; it is an 
undocumented feature. -- Unknown (from fortune's bofh-excuses)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kpat-diamond-reversed.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 113418 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-games-devel/attachments/20081110/e2bcecae/attachment-0001.jpeg