Should x11/qimageblitz remain maintained by kde@ ?

[Adriaan de Groot]

On Friday, 12 April 2019 20:19:57 CEST Tobias C. Berner wrote:
> > I am going to re-add the recently removed x11/qimageblitz, attaching the
> > approximate shar.

The last released version was from 2010, and firmly Qt4-only. While there was 
work done in SVN and it reached a point where it compiles (with warnings about 
"register" keyword) .. I have to ask "why bother?" In any case, you might 
avoid the PORTEPOCH by following the lead of some Linux distro's which have 
arbitrarily called this 0.1.0.

[ade]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/attachments/20190412/8d19ee49/attachment.sig>