[kde-freebsd] RFC: Need for 'NLS' and 'DOCS' options in KDE frameworks/plasma/applications ports

[Ralf Nolden]

Am Mittwoch, 26. August 2015, 23:02:06 schrieb Adriaan de Groot:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2015 20:38:28 Tobias Berner wrote:
> > Now, I'm interested if someone actually cares for these options? That is,
> > are there people who really want to be able _not_ to install docs and/or
> > language files?
> 
> Given KDE's strong i18n background, I am all for removing the NLS option and
> always installing the available translations. They should be mandatory.
> 
> For docs, I'm on the fence. I'd suggest always installing them, for
> simplicity (and then in all available translations, akin to NLS).
> 
> [ade]


So, given that kde5 now basically consists of 3 parts: frameworks, plasma and 
apps, how about checking if a single l10n port for each of those would make 
sense ? That would allow updating l10n and docs for each whenever the ports 
for a certain part gets an update from KDE upstream.

If that would be the best practice to handle upstream sources, then we can 
still think about splitting those ports up into separate languages for 
installation size.


Ralf
> _______________________________________________
> kde-freebsd mailing list
> kde-freebsd at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
> See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

-- 
Kind regards,

Ralf Nolden