Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 291 - Unstable!

[Tobias C. Berner]

Moin moin

I will update the installation in around 8 hours


mfg Tobias

On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 21:52, Christoph Cullmann <christoph at cullmann.io> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-04-05 21:40, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > On Monday, 5 April 2021 19:20:08 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:33 AM Christoph Cullmann
> >> <christoph at cullmann.io>
> >> > I reverted my test commit to see if we have still some unpatched 5.15
> >> > with a broken QJSEngine around again.
> >> >
> >> > Still, I think it would be great if one could have some patched version
> >> > in the CI.
> >> >
> >> > Could one update there the Qt installation to the latest available patch
> >> > release?
> >
> > It would be really useful if you specified **what** version; if
> > ktexteditor
> > requires Qt 5.15.2, then please set the minimum Qt version to 5.15.2.
> > Do not
> > allow 5.15.0 and then complain that it triggers crashes. Alternately,
> > use
> > QEXPECT_FAIL if you have a beef with specific Qt versions.
>
> is that allowed for Frameworks?
> Naturally that would be preferable.
>
> I just wanted to test with my commit if the CI stuff has fresh enough
> stuff
> that has no broke QJSEngine. That failed ;=) But if you update as said
> below,
> that is nice.
>
> I would love to raise the version to minimal 5.15.2 given that 5.15
> below that path
> has a QJSEngine that randomly crashes during GC, for everything.
>
> I am still amazed that not more stuff fails there, given our javascripts
> are trivial,
> perhaps we are just unlucky to have unit tests with JS stuff.
>
> > All that said, yes, we can update the CI builders to 5.15.2, which is
> > what
> > most folk on FreeBSD would be using now anyway.
>
> That would be great!
>
> Greetings
> Christoph
>
> --
> Ignorance is bliss...
> https://cullmann.io | https://kate-editor.org