D13216: Overhaul the file index scheduler.

Stefan BrĂ¼ns noreply at phabricator.kde.org
Thu Jun 7 20:30:04 UTC 2018


bruns added a comment.


  In D13216#275546 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D13216#275546>, @smithjd wrote:
  
  > In D13216#275538 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D13216#275538>, @bruns wrote:
  >
  > > @smithjd You have probaly become another victim of phabricator/arc.  Your commits have been squashed by arc ...
  > >  If you wan't your commits to stay separated, you have to do a `git checkout` of the first commit, do a `arc diff HEAD^1`, checkout the next commit, `arc diff HEAD^1`, and so on.
  >
  >
  > Commits are squashed on arc land anyway, but the branch can be manually pushed keeping the separate patches. If you mean separated into different reviews, I don't think it's unclear why there are small changes to code related to the scheduler, or why it might be advantageous to separate these into different reviews.
  >
  > Is there any practical reason why a simple arc land wouldn't suffice here?
  
  
  Because pushing independent stuff in a single commit just sucks for the reviewer, and it sucks if you want to understand the git history later.
  
  You are changing 5 different things in your patches. I can not see which changed source line relates to which change.

REPOSITORY
  R293 Baloo

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D13216

To: smithjd, bruns, mgallien
Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, #baloo, ashaposhnikov, michaelh, astippich, spoorun, ngraham, bruns
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20180607/9c22262d/attachment.html>


More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list