D5090: More focus on KIO than Konqueror

[Luigi Toscano]

ltoscano added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> aacid wrote in kprotocolmanager.cpp:844
> This may be techinically correct, but it's going to break stuff that uses user agent detection (yes i know, that's broken but people use it still), so -1

(like Gecko) kio_http/<ver> (previously Konqueror/<ver>)

? 
:)

REPOSITORY
  R241 KIO

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D5090

To: ltoscano, dfaure
Cc: aacid, lueck, #frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20170318/c7c0396a/attachment.html>