Review Request 127959: Adding missing license

[Martin Gräßlin]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127959/#review95623
-----------------------------------------------------------



I would prefer that we properly investigate each of the cases. E.g. plasma-framework showed that the files are just incorrectly licensed.

- Martin Gräßlin


On May 19, 2016, 1:50 p.m., Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127959/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 19, 2016, 1:50 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark.
> 
> 
> Repository: khtml
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> We are currently shipping an LGPL-2.1 copy in the COPYING.LIB file, but
> some parts of the code are under a LGPL-2 only license (see:
> autotests/kencodingdetectortest.cpp autotests/kencodingdetectortest.h
> src/html/kopenssl.cpp src/html/kopenssl.h src/khtml_printsettings.cpp
> src/khtml_printsettings.h src/kmultipart/httpfiltergzip.cpp
> src/kmultipart/httpfiltergzip_p.h src/rendering/table_layout.cpp
> src/rendering/table_layout.h) and the LGPL license requires shipping the
> full text with the source code.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   COPYING.LGPL-2 PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127959/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maximiliano Curia
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20160519/8775be71/attachment.html>