Review Request 127093: Drop KDocTools requirement

[David Faure]

> On Feb. 18, 2016, 11:37 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Why is suddenty documentation less important than the rest? Do you even get a hint saying you must install kdoctools to get documetnation or it silently skips it?

Documentation is very important. However there are use cases for compiling without documentation if it helps reducing dependencies: e.g. compiling for an embedded device. The developers read the docs installed by their desktop packages, not the docs installed onto the embedded device.


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127093/#review92543
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 18, 2016, 10:34 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127093/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 18, 2016, 10:34 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Alex Merry.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdesignerplugin
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Like in many other frameworks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt bbec850 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127093/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Builds with and without kdoctools.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20160220/dd5910ba/attachment.html>